If I had to sum up the process I went through in writing my short story in one word, it'd probably have to be "unique." While there were many unorthodox or "unique" methods I tried in writing this story, I think the most drastic change I made to my normal writing process were how I attempted to force myself into writing; to "just write" and worry about editing and making sense out of it later, instead of having it thought out ahead of time. For pretty much all of high school I've been following a process where I sort of let brilliance come to me (not to sound too arrogant) and then rolling with an idea from therer. In other, less lofty, words I guess you could say I wait for an idea I truly like to come along before I really delve into writing, but I tried something new this time around, and it made for quite a different experience.
I knew a few things I liked about my story before writing it, not too much, but I knew enough of what I wanted it to look like to get the ball rolling. Or so I thought. First of all, one of the biggest setbacks for this whole writing process was how slowly I came to an idea for a story, completely scrapping an idea for the fragment (stage 1), then scrapping another fragment (still stage 1), then finally setting on a rough idea that would evolve into my latest work, "Ante Up." Beginning my first draft though, I knew I wanted it to be about something BIG. I wanted it to have meaning, but I also wanted to inspire and shock readers, an idea that I would later realize is the "basis for virtually every independent film ever made." (Google 'Thinkfilms' if you want to see what I mean) I looked at some of my favorite movies and stories to inspire my own creativity and get the writing juices flowing, only to realize a little too far down the road how terrible of an idea that was. Writing (or at least my writing) needs to be organic; I need to be able to formulate my own original idea, no matter how long it takes me, and run with it from there. Probably the biggest disturbance in my writing process was how forced it became at times. Whether it was to meet a deadline or to move the story through a rut, I found myself trying to push it along without thinking about the final product simply due to the pressure I felt to finish (although surprisingly some of my best writing comes from pressure laden 2:30 writing sessions) (that's 2:30am). Being someone who usually has a lot of integrity for their work, perhaps even too much sometimes considering how offended I see myself get at criticism, it's sort of appalling to look back and see how I tried desperately to move what seemed to be a nowhere bound story by forcing it down a shallow, at times even random, path so I could move on to the next part.
The way I like to write (whether it be a short story, poem, essay, etc.) is a process that probably makes most English teachers and writers squirm; I think through the whole story in my head first making sure I know what I want it to eventually look like, before putting pen to paper so that all I have to do is write down what plays out in my head. This time around however, partially due to suggestions to "deepen the story's narrative" and partially due to my own inability to see value in my initial idea, I decided just to write. To let thoughts flow and write them down as they come, creating a sort of stream of conscious story with a very unique plot and complex characters. That's the hope anyways, but because I wasn't able to sort through my thoughts and take inventory of how I actually wanted the story to play out, my story constantly felt lost and inadequate throughout most of the writing process. It wasn't until I was able to sift through what I'd written already and take a new approach, figuring out my plot before setting out to tell it, did I achieve any sort of success with developing a story that makes somewhat sense and, more importantly, has a level of closure in it, telling both me (the writer) and the reader that there is a well thought-out, meaningful plot within the story.
In retrospect, I have to pat myself on the back a little bit for salvaging what at times seemed like a hopeless story, and turning into something that I'm actually okay with putting my name on. I was only able to write comfortably after returning to my normal process of figuring out what it is that I want to say, and then articulating the story on paper. When I have the plot moderately planned out already, it's hard to chunk the writing into definite steps and fit it into a gradable "story writing process." This is part of the reason steps one and two seemed like introductions to a greater story to come, when in fact it was actually part of the narrative, I just needed to let the story develop, which pretty much happened in my final draft before turning the story in; in "one fell swoop" where I synthesized the middle and ending with the inaugural first two drafts. While I would like to keep my writing process basically the same, I do feel I need to learn how to fit it into a more logical set of steps so that I could get feedback on my ideas without having to actually write them down in a place where they won't make sense or won't stay in for later drafts. I am glad that I was able to churn out another piece of writing that I can turn in knowing it's moderately entertaining, well developed, and contains some emotional closure, especially considering the first two drafts were regarded predominately as "incipient" (which, to some extent, I don't necessarily disagree with). I wish I could've found a more direct and rational approach to the writing and maturing of my story, possibly avoiding some of the anxiety and sleep deprivation I suffered along the way, but I suppose that's secondary to being able to produce comfortably a sophisticated and developed story. And, considering the fact that whatever grade I get on this story doesn't really mean much to me because I achieved some "emotional closure," I guess I can say All's Well That Ends Well
(I do plan on continuing to revise it though so that I can say I actually like the story after all the effort I've put into it, but for now I'll say it "ends well")
March 22, 2012
Hey Jack,
ReplyDeleteFirst of all, I really like your blogging voice! I could actually picture you saying this in the midst of a conversation and I think that it made the blog a whole lot more enjoyable to read. Your writing reveals a lot of intelligence but it's very natural, not fabricated and stuffy, which is great. I was absorbed in your post simply because I've always thought my approach to writing was a little funky .Hearing about different methods allows me to try new things. I've never thought about fully mapping things out before I write, I'm more of the other type of writer that you were describing above. (Get a general idea and just write.) I agree that it doesn't work for everyone but I'm glad you at-least tried it. Maybe next time I write a paper I'll try to plan things out a bit more since it seems to be your go-to method. I could totally relate when you said "I looked at some of my favorite movies and stories to inspire my own creativity and get the writing juices flowing, only to realize a little too far down the road how terrible of an idea that was." I thought my original story idea was the bees knees but after delving a little bit deeper into it, I realized there was no substance. It was a moment of sheer panic but I'm happy with where I ended up taking the story . Goodluck on your final draft, with such an open mind you should be fine .(: